Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Aug 15, 2026 12:56

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 17:42 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
From the Beeb.

Quote:
A mother has been banned from driving after being caught speeding three times in 24 minutes as she went to collect medication for her sick son.

Jill Hunneman, 47, was clocked on each occasion travelling at 40mph in a 30mph zone by the same hand-held speed camera in Eggbuckland Road, Plymouth.


Already had 9 points. :shock:

Devon and cornwall Scammers kindly provide a pic and map location of the fixed site.
Image

Image

This highlights one of the failings of speed cameras. They don't stop people speeding!

Anyone with local knowledge? From the pic and aerial photo it doesn't look like an obvious spot for a 30 limit, possibly one where a real bib might turn a blind eye.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 18:39 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
I guess though that even if they had of been taken as being 1 offence, with 9 points she would still have been banned - but would it have been for so long? Or is 6 months the norm for totting up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 23:44 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 20:40
Posts: 10
Location: South West
Quote:
Anyone with local knowledge?


It is a borderline 40 limit IMHO, although around the corner at the bottom of the hill there is a school and further up the hill parked cars make the road narrow.

The Gatso of course only covers the downhill section well before the dangerous area around the school. :roll:

I've never heard of a mobile camera being used here before, maybe the Gatso is too visible to be effective (at cash collecting). :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 00:00 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
I don't see any speed limit repeater signs on that piece of road and, if their real intention was to keep people below 30mph, there would be.

and if there's a school at the bottom of that hill, why no warning sign before the bend?

Nice shiny GATSO though, and covert enforcement on the other side of the road. Show me the money baby, yeah !!!!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 07:44 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 18:41
Posts: 893
Homer wrote:
Anyone with local knowledge? From the pic and aerial photo it doesn't look like an obvious spot for a 30 limit, possibly one where a real bib might turn a blind eye.

Yep, I'm reasonably local - I used to live about half a mile away from that location. The Gatso was one of the first in Plymouth. There is a bus-stop just past the Gatso and there's a school about a quarter of a mile further down - just past the bridge over the A38. There are residential areas both sides of the road with two access roads to the left (one each side of the Gatso), and one on the right. The residential road to the right (Military Road) is regularly used as a rat-run to avoid congestion at Marsh Mills roundabout. Before the Gatso, traffic used to regularly travel at 50 to 60 and it was an accident blackspot.

Assuming the circle on the aerial photo shows the location of the hand-held, it would be ideally placed to zap traffic on the very steep downward hill on the other side of the valley and the other side of the school (which is indicated by the arrow in this map). Also not obvious from your post is that the Delamere Road is the main access road to the area from the A38 Plymouth Parkway. As such, you can expect traffic to pull out from Delamere Road into Eggbuckland Road - and the junction is blind until you're less than a hundred yards away. So going down the steep hill on the approach to the junction at significantly more than the speed limit is (IMO) not safe.

A bit rough on the lady concerned, but IMO one of the more defensible locations.

_________________
Will


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 09:28 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
willcove wrote:
So going down the steep hill on the approach to the junction at significantly more than the speed limit is (IMO) not safe.

A bit rough on the lady concerned, but IMO one of the more defensible locations.

I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but if Willcove is right about that then WTF is the point of allowing her to continue to speed for up to a possible fortnight after she was caught? To me this is a perfect example of the worst way in which this system fails even when used in the right locations. Had she been caught initially by a copper they'd have "had words" with her as well as issued a ticket, which would very likely have prevented the later offences and hopefully changed her driving in that area. As it is, it's pretty clear that being caught the first time in no way stopped her from doing it twice more in qucik succession, and for all we know again and again over the next few days. Duh.

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 17:24 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
If


Last edited by camera operator on Sat Sep 23, 2006 15:59, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 18:08 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
camera operator wrote:
If you read the report fully one offence going for medicine, one offence coming back the third offence she was caught going to get some chips... i would say this is an example of a Gatso rider getting her chips literaly
Ye-e-e-s, but if her driving is of such poor standard that it merits a fine and points isn't it better to put a stop to it right away rather than delay action until the NIP lands on her doormat? Since the school report thread has brought it to mind, if you were caught misbehaving at school how long did your teacher wait before doling out a detention or crappy essay or set of lines as punishment? Did they do it right away or did they wait a week or so and then tell you?

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 18:13 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
fair point gatsobait


Last edited by camera operator on Sat Sep 23, 2006 15:58, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 08:55 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
camera operator wrote:
i would say this is an example of a Gatso rider getting her chips literaly


Yep, I have no disagreement with that. With 9 points on he licence already she should really have been much more careful.

But isn't the person manning the speed trap guilty of aiding and abetting?

As for who was manning it and what sort of device it was, we only have the Beeb's flakey reporting to go on. Just because they say "hand held" doesn't mean it wasn't a fully armoured talivan.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 519 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.091s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]