Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Aug 07, 2026 10:50

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 18:24 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
diy wrote:
this is rather stupid, will they ban parents from tutoring their kids in maths next because they are not maths teachers. If 'dad' can get you to the required standard that this should be good enough. Also as 'dad' has emotional attachment he/she is more likely to do a decent job than the instructor who is primarily looking to earn a living from instruction. Of course the ADI's will be pushing for this.. chance to print money..

still keeps another load of feckwits off the streets, as I suspect they'll be a big gap in the market for driving instructors.

The dvla should be making sure people take regular follow up training not a one off mega course never to be repeated again. In every profession people take ongoing training, why should driving be different.

Sounds like part p for electricians, home information packs etc.. create an industry and regulation, where market forces were doing just fine


Part P y'say? So those who always "did the right thing" have to pay loadsamoney to continue while those who don't care just carry on regardless, and if you know the right people you can have the shoddiest work fully certified?

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 18:52 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
hairyben wrote:
diy wrote:
this is rather stupid, will they ban parents from tutoring their kids in maths next because they are not maths teachers. If 'dad' can get you to the required standard that this should be good enough. Also as 'dad' has emotional attachment he/she is more likely to do a decent job than the instructor who is primarily looking to earn a living from instruction. Of course the ADI's will be pushing for this.. chance to print money..

still keeps another load of feckwits off the streets, as I suspect they'll be a big gap in the market for driving instructors.

The dvla should be making sure people take regular follow up training not a one off mega course never to be repeated again. In every profession people take ongoing training, why should driving be different.

Sounds like part p for electricians, home information packs etc.. create an industry and regulation, where market forces were doing just fine


Part P y'say? So those who always "did the right thing" have to pay loadsamoney to continue while those who don't care just carry on regardless, and if you know the right people you can have the shoddiest work fully certified?


As an Electrician myself what also peeved me with Part P was that even though I have my City & Guilds 240 (of which part of it was for inspection and testing of electrical installations), If I do certain modifications in my own (or anyone else’s house) I would have to get some jobs worth from the council to come and test and inspect my work, at a cost of a couple of hundred pounds.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 23:33 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Oh I know that feeling well! A few years ago, I wanted to buy a car (a whole £300 worth!) which, it transpired, had been a write-off in some previous existence! My insurers had a hissy fit when they found it had been a "Category B" write off! I remonstrated that there wasn't anything much worng with the car and that it certainly didn't look like it has suffered any accident damage at all - never mind "category B"! Still, they insisted that I got an engineer's report on it. I asked if I could do it, and volunteered the information that I was a chartered engineer whose chosen discipline was vehicle structures and occupant protection but that didn't cut any ice at all with them. They insisted that it had to be a "qualified motor engineer". :roll:

..Anyway, I engaged the serices of a pretty decent chap who was mightily amused by the situation and it turned out, on investigation that the car had been worngly classified (clerical error!) and should have been a category "D" write off - it had broken a headlight (which on a £300 car is as good as writing it off)!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 00:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Quote:
and if you know the right people you can have the shoddiest work fully certified?


And quite often without even realising it! :shock:

Thats one of the main reasons why I would rather do it myself! ( the other is that for various family reasons I have to work limited part time and, as a consequence, make less than the minimum wage! :oops: The only way I can survive is by doing EVERYTHING myself! (It should come as no surprise that my work vehicle is an ancient VW transporter and my "domestic" transport is an equaly anciient Range Rover! (with LPG) The MIG welder is my freind! :twisted: ))

(The "Other" other reason IYSWIM is that I frequently think I can do things better! For example, I have TRV's on all my radiators, of what benefit is a "room thermostat" yet apparantly this is a "requirement" on CH systems! :roll: (needless to say I do *not* have a "room thermostat"!)

At least I know what I have done, and as a graduate engineer I have a pretty good idea as to whether it is safe or not! I wouldnt trust any bloody stranger to come into my house and monkey arround with my wiring/gas/whatever (And pee in my water tank, rummage through my draws, raid my fridge etc etc etc! :x )

DON't be affraid to install, say, your own boiler. Just follow the instructions! They are typically VERY GOOD! (remember, they are intended for people who left school at 16 with no GCSE's (or whatever they are called these days))

(Therer are design defeciencys with boilers as supplied however The "Mounting plates" that many wall hung boilers are supplied with are very poor and could be improved! :wink: )

D

:D

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 09:38 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
Well - I am a parent #. :scratchchin:

My young driver kids wanted anyone BUT me to teach 'em though :shock: (I think they thought I'd be too "strict and nick 'em for "speeding" :lol:)


Seriously - did what the Mad Doc did - booked block of lessons and then let them practise with lots of different decent "enthusiasts" around the family and pal circle and then "tightened them up" with another block of lessons with an ADI before they took the practical test. They followed up with Pass Plus and .. yep.. they are also IAM Members etc too :bow:

Andy71 wrote:
Unfortunately the instructor can only see how the pupil drives when he/she is in the car with the pupil, it would be a bit harsh to punish an instructor/examiner for passing a model pupil just because they turned into a hooligan once released on the roads.

I would take more time to stress the consequences of crashing a lot more during the drinver training. We had a cracking road safety presentation by a traffic copper where I work last year, some shocking photos of real accidents and a few idiots filming themselves driving which led to crashes. This made a lot of people sit up and think, I would make something similar compulsory.


We do go out to schools and colleges and explain very clearly the dangers out there. Yep - we do use some "shock photos" to underpin the message of what can happen if we fail to COAST.

Unfortunately, there's always that 5% who never quite understand the message :shock: :banghead:

We also find too many kids fail to wear seatbelts these days. :shock:

Quote:
It's been suggested many times before but what if we required a motorway test before being allowed to drive on motorways, obviously this would have to be phased in over a few years to allow the millions of drivers to get this new qualification.

This could even be part of an introduction of compulsory re-testing which I personally would be in favour of. It would cost a few quid but it would stop people thinking that passing your driving test means you know everything about driving.


Oh I agree. My own driving instructor told me that this was a life skill which I would continue to learn for life. My Hendon tutors said the same: that passing the Advanced Class 1 Hendon course was just the beginning and that these skills would have to be built on continually.

I think Pass Plus should be made compulsory as this allows the young driver to get a little more experience out there and then fine-tune. I think we all live in the vicinity of a motorway/A(M)/ or a fast dual carriageway which has a "motorway feel and look" which could be used to meet this rubric.


I also think that country windy roads must be a compulsory element as these can be lethal for too many novices :shock:

This might lead to a nation of drivers more likely to leave a safety bubble around their car instead of tailgating, allowing the motorway speed limit to be raised.

Quote:
Get caught tailgating, revoke the motorway licence until the test is passed again.

Alternately if the government were serious about road safety they could reward people by having different levels of insurance tax based on the training level of the car driver. Hang on I just suggested the government cutting tax, I'll go run my head under cold water. That's almost as silly as having genuine road safety measures instead of scammeras.



Yep - we've already discussed the "carrot" of insurance based on training and not post code. Naturally the value of the car would remain more or less unchanged as regards "insured valuable against potential loss". But driver expertise and qualifications as well as an absence of "fault claims" should be taken into account. :wink:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 16:43 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
Dixie wrote:
As an Electrician myself what also peeved me with Part P was that even though I have my City & Guilds 240 (of which part of it was for inspection and testing of electrical installations), If I do certain modifications in my own (or anyone else’s house) I would have to get some jobs worth from the council to come and test and inspect my work, at a cost of a couple of hundred pounds.


To be fair, the market did need regulating, I've seen some appaulling stuff in my time and it was getting more and more often, especially in areas such as small outfit fast-turnaround speculative flat refurbs. sparks will want £3k & insist on rewire, moriz know leckrik - will do lekkik - just change sokkiks - all is needed - and for labourer rate too! Then it's up to me to tell the new owners that their nice new flat is a death trap and needs $$$, and BTW thats all inclusive of smashing all your nice decor too. Sick and tired of it.

So what the government did was to make honest people pay money and jump through hoops, while the bandits just ignore it all and carry on regardless- now with an evan bigger competative edge! So obviously I wouldn't recommend you do yer own electrics, but bugger all will come of it if you do.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 14:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 20:06
Posts: 77
hairyben wrote:
obviously I wouldn't recommend you do yer own electrics, but bugger all will come of it if you do.


Thats why I grapped loads of unused old style twin & earth from work when they changed over :twisted:

_________________
Re vera, cara mea, mea nil refert


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 16:32 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
In Gear wrote:
Yep - we do use some "shock photos" to underpin the message of what can happen if we fail to COAST.

Unfortunately, there's always that 5% who never quite understand the message :shock: :banghead:



I suspect you tailor your delivery to the audience, however remembering back to the dawn of my driving the use of shock photos would just have made me suspicious of the message, I would have decided that if you could not make a logical argument without resorting to such tactics it would limited use to me. Mind you Mr Spock was my hero when I was a teenager. :)

Back then what interested me about advanced driving (read books before even getting a provisional) was the way observation and space could be used to drive quicker if not necessarily faster, i.e higher average rather than top speed, and avoiding accidents was about avoiding the hassle of explaining it to my dad. Starting to ride bikes did shift my ideas a bit though, avoiding accidents became the priority.

Shifting back to the OT, while the miles done with my dad were valuable experience, including the first time I drove the car from cold and nearly crashed because the choke meant the car did not slow much when I came off the throttle, the lessons provided the extra knowledge I really needed. My DI was an ex-police instructor and towards the end he was covering techniques well beyond those needed to simply pass the test, I would therefore have to side on the idea of making at least some professional lessons compulsory providing they go beyond just 'how to pass the test'.

Perhaps something like the CBT before a new driver even gets a provisional license to drive on the road and a system more like the IAM observed drives should be how you gain a full license. That would hopefully lead drivers into taking further training to gain higher levels of competency.

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 443 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.064s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]