Shit! Bad luck mate.

This is a prime example of how ruthless and unfair speed cameras are, and how discretion at the roadside is vital. If a police officer had stopped you instead of you being caught the first time, then 1) you would have known about it under-reading there and then, and 2) the officer probably would have let you off once you'd demonstrated the problem with the speedo, told him that you hadn't realised, apologised and said you'd compensate for it and get it fixed ASAP, etc. Then the problem would have been solved, you'd have no ill will against the system, and everything would be fine. Even "Speeding is always dangerous" types
should be happy with that approach (assuming that they're not actually just anti-car), because then you wouldn't have been speeding the second or third times.
I can't really help you but I hope you manage to minimise the damage. If you haven't already, try
PePiPoo, as they give free advice to those accused of speeding. And when you've sorted it all out, you might want to stick around here, and hopefully join as a member once you realise that cameras are not only unfair, but they don't even make the roads safer (in fact quite the opposite)!
_________________
Paul Smith: a legend.
"The freedom provided by the motor vehicle is not universally applauded, however: there are those who resent the loss of state control over individual choice that the car represents. Such people rarely admit their prejudices openly; instead, they make false or exaggerated claims about the adverse effects of road transport in order to justify calls for higher taxation or restrictions on mobility." (
Conservative Way Forward:
Stop The War Against Drivers)