Hairyloon wrote:
WildCat wrote:
But we still have to have a set procedure und this has to be upheld for each und every case. It can also depend on situation. We once had a German in his big bad Porsche up here.. before the speed cams. He was nicked by the police.
In the court - via interpreter - who was allegedly struggling to keep straight face - he declared that "he got carried away on a nice piece of straight road at 5.30 am on a summery morning und thought he was back home"

And TBQF he may not have been doing an unreasonable speed for the situation (you don't say how fast or where).
M6... on that cute stretch up here

He was on the ton for three miles.. allegedly

Was not an unreasonable speed - given the only folk on the road were him und a couple of police cars (in the old days of patrol.. but why on earth

on the motorway und not protecting my house from them burglars

Quote:
Quote:
In this case - it was a tempo limit. The NIP was late. There ist a set timed procedure. It got chucked out because of this error on their part.
But he was still (allegedly) doing 87mph. And if the limit was temporary, then presumably they were at least pretending to have roadworks in which case 87mph is not likely to be a reasonable speed.
On of the things that really annoys in this country are the miles of cones.. with no workmen, JCB diggers or steramrollers or whatever.
For all we know this was at start of the roadworks. We usually see the speed cam or first of any SPECS - bang at the road works sign und tempo lolly - some of which have blown over by the wind

The final cams are at the very end of the road works stretch too.. with hardly any along the way (unless SPECS or the M60 or the M6 in scamland that time...plus on A1(M) again in scam hotspot ..

).
But anyway .. the positioning of these scams ist questionable as they know they can catch the unwary on the slow-down und on sight of seeing NSL/end roadworks in distance. A lot of folk begin to lose concentration und think "HURRAH! Outa roadworks!" und begin to speed up. They not looking at speedo here

...The scammers know plenty will do this.. which support the revenue raking suspicions.
The most notorious was M4 Wales. 2003. 50 mph limit. Folk had
passed the NSL sign und accelerating up to 70 mph.. only to be pinged. Most paid up because they recalled the roadworks und did not query it

Three people did... The cam was placed incorrectly

The smug prats said it was up to those pinged to contact them (but kept it local till someone told the "Waily"

). After the Waily got involved .. it seems a hell of a lot of folk had been "done" unfairly

I think Paulie

did have the cuttings on the main pages at the time..
Quote:
Quote:
It work the other way. If your return nominating driver arrive a day late - they can lay papers to court.. etc for failing to name...
But these same technicalities und not sticking to procedure can und are used when defending the real crimes which have tangible victim

So wouldn't it be better to have a sensible system that allows a bit for human error in both directions?
Yes.. but unfortunately the pratsters und the muesli munchers und the little green blobbies do not want this
