dcbwhaley wrote:
theboxers wrote:
At one time I would have agreed with this. Then I realised experience without education is almost pointless.
Strongly disagree with that. There are self taught people in many fields who are the equal of people with formal qualifications.
I know I am one of them and as I said "almost". There are gaps in my knowledge base that do not become apparent until the need arises.
dcbwhaley wrote:
Quote:
Most people have over 100 hours of road experience on a bicycle. They usually start at about 5 years old then continue to ride, of and on, for the next 12 years. Unless they have done a proficiency course, or whatever they are now, they will not understand the reasons they sometimes get into bad situations. Even then they will, like most people, develop some bad habits.
I meant 100 hours
recent experience and in traffic. I have taught a few people to drive and have noticed that those who were experienced cyclists had much better road sense - observational skills and assessment of danger - than non cyclists. And -the real point of my suggestion

- much more tolerance of and consideration for cyclists.
I am not disagreeing with the idea. I just think that there are so many problems with it that make it almost impossible to develop.
How do you verify that 100 hours have been done? How do you verify that the person claiming the time has done them? How do you verify that they have been done to a sufficient standard that it will translate to a car? How long before the requirement for driving becomes a requirement for cycling? With many more to come.
This is part of a bigger problem that we are currently in. The "blame the driver" culture. We need to have a "take the responsibility" culture. That is all road users drivers, cyclists and peds. We need to stop people passing off their safety to a third party without due consideration of the risks and making it clear when they do.