Safe Speed Forums

i was caught by those follybottom camers while back nd the courts told me i would be refunded in full and the points removed but they only paid back half of the whole lot so im wondering if anyone knows of anyone setting up a protest against them or if anyone would be interested in starting a campaign against them

Have they told you why they are only paying half? Have you claimed other expenses that they have rejected?

Gareth

I think that was half of the people, not half of the cash.

Leisureowner, have you found your way to Barry Culshaw yet? (Solicitor in the middle of the case.)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety

I will join a protest against wiltshire

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code

Have I missed something? What are the 'follybottom' cameras and what is the problem with them?

I'm all for protesting against Wiltshire though hehe

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.

Yes, I'll join an anti-Wiltshire protest

They scammed people for exceeding a 40 limit that either wasn't signed or wasn't signed correctly.

BBC story.

they then tried to fund the refund by placing speed camera van on the bridges over the M4. This started the M4 protest.

This is a rare event... a protest about the policing (It must be embarsing policing a protest againt yourselves)

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code

if any of you are truely interested in getting involved if you would like to email me with your phone number i will get back to you

lukefglover@hotmail.com

oh i can you plz tell me how to contact this barry culshaw